Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

N.O.H.B. V. Ajogwu (2000) CLR 10(k) (CA)

Brief

  • Agency
  • AG of Federation (Status of)
  • Interpretation of statutes
  • Pleadings

Facts

The respondent, who was the plaintiff before the trial court claimed in paragraph 13 of his statement of claim jointly and severally against the appellants as defendants therein in the following terms:-

  • 13a
    a declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to his full salary from the time he was charged with a criminal offence to the time he reigned his appointment.
  • b.
    Special damages: The outstanding amount covering the plaintiff’s salary from May1987 to March 1995, both months inclusive as per above secular (sic) No CND/26/s.5/C/Vol. IV/380.
  • c.
    General damages of N1, 000,000.00.”

On 19-9-97, G. A. Adetola-Kaseem Esq, learned counsel for the appellants, filed a notice of preliminary objection dated 16/9/97 challenging the jurisdiction of the trial court, in limine, to entertain the suit. He relied on the provision of Section 230 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1979 as amended by the Constitution (Suspension and Modification) Decree No. 107 of 1993.

After due arguments by learned counsel on both sides, the learned trial Judge, in his considered ruling of 15/5/98, over-ruled the objection and in effect, assumed jurisdiction to entertain the suit.

The appellants felt dissatisfied with the stance taken by the trial Judge. They filed their notice of appeal dated 26/5/98 on the same date complaining against the whole decision.

Issues

  • 1.
    Whether the trial court was right in holding that the appellants are not...
    Read More